Account disabled on SC. Help?

TLDR

A cammer got her account disabled mid-stream for an "unverified user" on her account - while streaming in the same room as her sister, both of whom are fully verified. She's appealed twice with no luck, and honestly, this happens more often than platforms admit. It's frustrating, but there are real paths forward.

Why would a verified co-cammer trigger a disable?

Here's the messy truth: "unverified user on stream" usually doesn't mean what it sounds like. On most cam sites, anyone physically present in the frame - even briefly, even in the background - needs to be registered and verified *on that specific account* as an approved co-model. Being verified on your own separate account doesn't automatically count. Some platforms require you to formally link accounts or add each other as approved collaborators before sharing a room, and a lot of new models don't know that rule exists.

The kicker is that enforcement is often automated or triggered by user reports rather than real-time human review. That's why someone can do the same thing dozens of times without issue and then get flagged out of nowhere. It also explains why one twin got suspended and the other didn't - the flag probably landed on whichever stream triggered the detection or report, not on a careful judgment about who was at fault.

What can you actually do to fight it?

The standard appeal route clearly isn't working here, so escalate differently. Send a single, well-organized appeal that includes: both model usernames, proof that both accounts passed verification (screenshots of verification confirmation emails or account status pages), government ID redacted appropriately if the platform allows it for appeals, and a calm timeline of previous co-streams that went unflagged - that last part matters because it shows the "violation" was at worst a paperwork technicality, not a deception.

If two appeals have already been ignored, look for other channels: a support email separate from the ticket system, official social media accounts, or community forums and subreddits where platform staff sometimes respond to public (but polite) posts. Keep everything professional and factual - rage gets you muted, documentation gets you reinstated. And if all that fails, ask directly whether the account can be closed in good standing and whether a fresh application would be accepted. It's not ideal, but it beats waiting indefinitely.

One lesson worth taking regardless of outcome: before any future room share, get the co-cammer formally added to the account in writing, and screenshot the confirmation. Assumptions cost accounts.

Is it worth grinding this out, or moving on?

Persistence is worth two or three more weeks, but not months. If the platform won't budge after documented, reasonable appeals, that tells you something about how your income will be treated the next time a problem comes up. Meanwhile, keep streaming - having an active presence elsewhere is both backup income and negotiating leverage. If you're looking for a fresh home, I'd point you toward [xlovecam](https://www.xlovecam.com); the verification and multi-model room setup is clearer, and support actually responds instead of stonewalling.

So the real question for anyone in this spot: how much of your livelihood do you want tied to a platform that disables first and reviews never?